I run Fedora, and ruby packages are always a problem. Do we get them from the Fedora package system, or via the ruby gem system?
I haven't run the database for a while, have upgraded to the latest Fedora (which is Fedora 34 as of August, 2021) and I get the following when I try to start the application:
Ignoring atk-3.4.3 because its extensions are not built. Try: gem pristine atk --version 3.4.3 Ignoring glib2-3.4.3 because its extensions are not built. Try: gem pristine glib2 --version 3.4.3 Ignoring sqlite3-1.4.2 because its extensions are not built. Try: gem pristine sqlite3 --version 1.4.2I get a lot of other chatter too, but the crucial issue seems to be that it cannot find the sqlite3 package. Indeed, if I just fire up ruby and type "require sqlite3" I get the same errors. Fedora does offer a package "rubygem-sqlite3.x86_64". I install it using the command
su dnf install rubygem-sqlite3But I continue to get the same error. I decide to take the hint given in the error and try:
su gem pristine atk --version 3.4.3 gem pristine glib2 --version 3.4.3 gem pristine sqlite3 --version 1.4.2This does not work (it says if "Failed to find gems").
So I try doing it as a plain old user (myself) and it works:
gem pristine atk --version 3.4.3 gem pristine glib2 --version 3.4.3 gem pristine sqlite3 --version 1.4.2Who knows why this kind of crap is necessary. Python is not better with multiple versions of python and utter confusion about packages and python versions. There is only one answer. Shoot the developers! We don't want slick new versions that cause trouble, we want old crusty versions that work.
As per notes above, the first thing is to do the following as user "tom":
gem pristine atk --version 3.4.3 gem pristine glib2 --version 3.4.3 gem pristine sqlite3 --version 1.4.2And that does it! Well, that was only 5 minutes of work -- there were a bunch of other frightening errors related to sqlite3, but they are apparently all fixed by doing the "gem pristine" thing.
But I can't leave well enough alone. I do this:
su gem uninstall glib2 gem install glib2The uninstall gets rid of 3.3.6, the install gives me 4.1.6. I get warned that atk and cairo depend on glib2. Note that there is confusion between packages installed by Fedora, gems installed by root, and gems installed by tom. I am still getting a warning about glib2-3.4.3, which apparently is installed by "tom". When I try (as tom) to uninstall glib2, I get the error "You don't have write permissions for the /usr/share/gems directory". This would seem to be a bug. I am feeling cranky, so I do this as "tom"
rm -rf /home/tom/.gemAnd now my database starts up just fine, and without warning. On with the show.
gem list --local ERROR: Loading command: list (LoadError) libruby.so.3.2: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory - /usr/local/lib64/gems/ruby/io-wait-0.3.1/io/wait.soI get errors like this, all from libruby and unable to find various files. Or so it claims -- actually the files are all there in /usr/local.
I am running Fedora 40 and ruby 3.3.4. It looks like what is missing is libruby.so.3.2. My system has /usr/lib64/libruby.so.3.3 and 3.3.4.
So, I tried uninstalling and reinstalling "gem", now let's get more brutal.
su cd /usr/local/lib64 mv gems gems_BOGUSThis seems beneficial. I still get errors when I run "gem", but different more sensible errors.
mkmf.rb can't find header files for ruby at /usr/share/include/ruby.h You might have to install separate package for the ruby development environment, ruby-dev or ruby-devel for example. Gem files will remain installed in /u1/home/tom/.local/share/gem/ruby/gems/strscan-3.1.0 for inspection.
Indeed, I do
su dnf install ruby-develAfter this I try "gem update" (not as root) once again. This looks better.
My guess is that the issue here is a possible 3 way confict between how gems may be installed. Once is via the fedora package system (bad, except for "gem" itself). The other is for gems installed as root (either do this always or install as a specific user always). The last is gems installed as a specific user. I will try to always install gems as user "tom".
I still cannot start "micros", but get more sensible errors (I think), such as:
Ignoring atk-4.2.0 because its extensions are not built. Try: gem pristine atk --version 4.2.0 Ignoring bigdecimal-3.1.6 because its extensions are not built. Try: gem pristine bigdecimal --version 3.1.6 Ignoring date-3.3.4 because its extensions are not built. Try: gem pristine date --version 3.3.4I try to do as it says, trying:
gem pristine atk gem pristine atk --version 4.2.0 gem install atkThe last of the above seems to work, although I still get complaints. Along the way, I get this notification -- which I will ignore since I installed "gem" from the fedora package system.
A new release of RubyGems is available: 3.5.11 → 3.5.16! Run `gem update --system 3.5.16` to update your installation.
cd /home/tom mv .local .local_BOGUSAgain, things seem to be going nowhere. I can "gem install gtk3", but then when I try to run "micros", I still get (at the end of a long list of errors):
in `require': cannot load such file -- gtk3 (LoadError)So, this is all totally broken. Maybe I am forced to rewrite this code in Python.
Before I resort to that, more brutality:
su cd /usr/local/share mv gems gems_BOGUS exit gem list --no-version | xargs gem uninstall -aIxThis leads simply to more confusion and grief.
Tom's Mineralogy Info / [email protected]