systemd-udevd[269]: renamed network interface eth0 to eno1This is a clue. I go to /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts and copy ifcfg-eth0 to ifcfg-eno1, make a few trivial edits, then do:
service network restart service httpd restartYeah, I could (should?) be using the systemctl command just to get into new habits, but I fall back to my old ways when the pressure is on. This gets me on the air and I can use google to find out what fool nonsense this new interface name is all about.
The Fedora buzzword for this insane hassle is "Predictable Network Interface Names", which is the best joke I have heard in a long time.
I thought they had got this all out of their system back when they renamed eth0 to em1, but apparently they liked that so much they are doing it yet again.The fix to turn this off is to create the following link:
cd /etc/udev/rules.d ln -s /dev/null 80-net-name-slot.rulesIndeed after creating this link and rebooting, I have eth0 instead of em1 or eno1.
/etc/xinetd.d/rsh.rpmsaveBeing curious, I left this as it was and tried booting my diskless systems that I know rely on rsh, and indeed they fail to boot. I then renamed this back to /etc/xinetd.d/rsh and did a service xinetd restart and now the systems can boot.
Jul 11 15:47:58 cholla systemd[1]: matlab-lm.service: control process exited, code=exited status=1 Jul 11 15:47:58 cholla systemd[1]: Failed to start Mathworks License Manager. Jul 11 15:47:58 cholla systemd[1]: Unit matlab-lm.service entered failed state. Jul 11 15:47:59 cholla ntpd[577]: Listen normally on 4 eth0 199.104.150.52 UDP 123 Jul 11 15:47:59 cholla ntpd[577]: Listen normally on 5 eth0:mmt 192.168.100.52 UDP 123 Jul 11 15:47:59 cholla ntpd[577]: peers refreshed Jul 11 15:47:59 cholla httpd[938]: AH00557: httpd: apr_sockaddr_info_get() failed for cholla.mmto.arizona.edu Jul 11 15:47:59 cholla httpd[938]: AH00558: httpd: Could not reliably determine the server's fully qualified domain name, using 127.0.0.1. Set the 'ServerName' directive globally to suppress this message Jul 11 15:48:01 cholla ntpd_intres[639]: host name not found: 0.fedora.pool.ntp.org Jul 11 15:48:01 cholla ntpd_intres[639]: host name not found: 1.fedora.pool.ntp.org Jul 11 15:48:01 cholla ntpd_intres[639]: host name not found: 2.fedora.pool.ntp.org Jul 11 15:48:01 cholla ntpd_intres[639]: host name not found: 3.fedora.pool.ntp.org Jul 11 15:48:01 cholla systemd[1]: Started MySQL database server. Jul 11 15:48:02 cholla kernel: [ 24.514111] e1000e: eth0 NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: Rx/Tx Jul 11 15:48:02 cholla kernel: [ 24.514150] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth0: link becomes readyI find that if I disable nscd (systemctl disable nscd.service), then httpd will start up. This is some kind of race condition fostered by systemd (and we have seen our share of those).
I add ServerName cholla.mmto.org:80 to httpd.conf, but I still get:
unable to find IPv4 address of "cholla.mmto.arizona.edu"It is interesting that it is using the name that it probably got from /etc/hostname, rather than the name I gave it on the ServerName line.
I filed this as a bug:
The issue with ntp is only transitory, it sorts itself out later, most likely this is something related to nscd not yet getting started.
But, for some reason this system has worse problems, and when I try to do bundle install or bundle update, I get:
cannot load such file -- rubygems/format (LoadError)On a whim I do "gem update", and indeed after this I can run bundle update and bundle install. However, bundle install must be run before bundle update to get the psych thing fixed up. So, to get things patched up:
gem update gem uninstall libv8 (all versions) gem install therubyracer -v '0.10.1' bundle install bundle update bundle installThere was some odd snafu with libv8 and "therubyracer" versions that bundle could not sort out by itself, but the above rain dance worked, and the final bundle install actually didn't install anything. After this, I get:
SECURITY WARNING: No secret option provided to Rack::Session::Cookie. This poses a security threat. It is strongly recommended that you provide a secret to prevent exploits that may be possible from crafted cookies. This will not be supported in future versions of Rack, and future versions will even invalidate your existing user cookies.This application runs Rails 3.2.6, and what I am reading says that I can safely just ignore this warning, ultimately it is a rails bug. Updating to Rails 3.2.11 or 3.2.13 is one fix.
At any rate, this has this old rails project running under Fedora 19.
Adventures in Computing / [email protected]